Tuesday, May 12, 2015

DEPORTED WOMEN OF THE SS SPECIAL SECTION (1976)


This Nazisploitation classic released in 1976 was directed by Rino de Silvestro and stars exploitation film legend John Steiner as the sadistic camp warden torturing bevies of beautiful naked women for the glory of the Third Reich.


The blog Oh, The Horror gives a pretty good summary of what there is of a plot:  "Its loose plot revolves around a group of women shipped off to a Nazi death camp, where they're humiliated and forced to serve as field whores.  Depraved commander Erner (John Steiner) lords over the camp with the help of various wicked wardens, all of whom sexually degrade and torment the captives."



To get the idea what kind of movie this is, one of the longest sequences is at the beginning, when after arriving at the camp we get several good close ups of the prisoners' pubic hair being shaved.  As Oh, The Horror notes: "If the films aspirations weren't already apparent here, just know that it actually has no ramifications on the movie at all - none of the women appear to be shorn at any later point in the film."



All the usual conventions of the "Women in Prison Movie" are here.  We got lots of sadistic lesbian guards.  And we've got the obligatory shower scene with lots of soapy naked girls.  (I guess since this is a concentration camp for whores to please the soldiers of the Third Reich you got to keep 'em clean!),


This movie was actually banned in Great Britain because of a scene near the end when the heroine gets her revenge on the camp warden by putting razor blades up her vagina before he has his date night with her!


The funniest thing was not the movie but the special features on the DVD I watched that had an interview with the director Rino de Silvestro where he, with a straight face, maintained that this was a serious film!  The interview with John Steiner was also a lot of fun.  When asked about Deported Women of the SS Special Section, Steiner laughed and said "What a piece of trash!"   The DVD from Intervision also contained a history of the Sadiconazista genre with German film historian Dr. Marcus Stiglegger (the lecture from Dr. Stiglegger may have been better than the movie to tell the truth!)


This was a pretty good piece of Euro Trash.  There's lots of pretty good looking naked women in it. Those fetish aficionados who get off on watching Nazis torture beautiful women, won't be disappointed.



Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Dirty! Dirty! Dirty!


I just finished reading Mike Edison's very entertaining history of "the four horsemen" of pornography: Playboy, Penthouse, Screw and Hustler.  As well as being a joint biography of Hugh Hefner, Bob Guccione, Al Goldstein and Larry Flynt, the book is also a cultural history of seedier side of culture in the United States from the founding of Playboy in 1953 until today.


Edison is the former publisher of High Times and editor in chief of Screw magazine.  Edison's opinionated and foul mouthed tome is highly enjoyable.  Who knew that there was so much to know about titty magazines?


Four a full review, I can't do better than this from Kirkus Review.  Highly recommended.


Hef in his heyday with main girlfriend Barbi Benton.
According to Edison, Hef was an ambitious nerd who got lucky
and was in the right place at the right time.

Hef was always selling a lifestyle and not just a titty magazine.
The "Playboy Philosophy" is basically that every guy can be well dressed,
have expensive toys, be an intellectual and still get laid at the same time.

These days the 85 year old Hef has to take lots of Viagra
and have gay porn playing in the background to be able to 
service his "girls next door".

Bob Guccione originally wanted to be a Catholic Priest!
Guccione thought that everything he did was art.
After losing millions of dollars on the movie Caligula and
losing millions more unsuccessfully trying to build a casino in Atlantic City,
Guccione died penniless in 2010.

The heyday of Penthouse was the 1970s and 80s.
At one time, Penthouse was fresh and daring and made Playboy look like what it was: 
your Dad's magazine

Screw magazine publisher Al Goldstein was a multi-millionaire, and owned a mansion in Florida.   Unwilling to expand into video and the internet, he died penniless in a nursing home.

In the good old days before the internet, Screw was hardcore and politically incorrect.

Champion of the First Amendment.  The guy who cussed out the Supreme Court to their faces.  Shot and paralyzed by a guy mad because Flynt published pictures of a black man with a white woman in Hustler, Flynt is sort of a martyr to the First Amendment.
By far the most successful pornographer of all time,  by going with the times and expanding into video and the internet, Flynt currently has a net worth of around 
$400 million.

Flynt admits he's a pornographer, unlike Hef the sophisticated gentleman and Guccione the artist. Between hardcore porn, the pages of Hustler contained hard hitting social and political commentary.



Sunday, September 21, 2014

SALON KITTY

As I mentioned in my post on The Last Orgy of the Gestapo, earlier this week I watched Tinto Brass's 1976 Nazi sexploitation classic Salon Kitty.  Like I mentioned in the earlier post, I didn't like it as well as the true sleazy exploitation film.


I'm not sure exactly why.  This movie has truly disgusting elements like scenes of hogs being slaughtered and gorgeous women having to make love to dwarves, hunchbacks and other beautiful women.  As evidenced by the excellent review by Ken Anderson on the blog Dreams Are What Le Cinema Is For which I posted a link to earlier, the gay guys apparently love this movie for all the over the top Nazi fetish costumes and lots of naked men, but it just didn't do much for me.

The recruits get ready to do their duty for the Fuhrer and Fatherland!

Granted, actress Teresa Ann Savoy looks real good naked and we get to see a whole lot of her that way, but for some reason the movie just falls flat for me.  But I liked the really awful Last Orgy of the Gestapo, go figure?

Teresa Ann Savoy in the "costume" she gets to wear for most of the film!

This movie is very loosely based on a real incident where the SS took over a high class brothel in Berlin, made all the whores SS agents, and then bugged the rooms and recorded the pillow talk of high ranking Nazis.  The real historical situation seems a lot more interesting than the fictional version in this movie.


I think my real problem with Salon Kitty is that it's trying too hard to be a respectable movie, rather than coming right out and going for the exploitation.   You got fabulous costumes and fancy sets and they even make an effort at having a high brow plot with political and social comment.  Last Orgy of the Gestapo was pretty much an exploitation picture from the first frame to the last.  I guess I just like my sleazy trash served up as sleazy trash and not masquerading as art.


Really? A skin tight suit with SS runes and a swastika broach! 
All the well dress Nazis have one this year!


LAST ORGY OF THE GESTAPO


Yesterday afternoon I watched the notorious 1977 Italian made Nazi sexploitation movie L’ultima Orgia del III Reich (which makes more sense than the American title “The Last Orgy of the Gestapo”).   This movie is so notorious that it was actually banned in Great Britain. 

Lisa Cohen (Daniela Poggi) and other Sex Slaves

This movie has everything you’d expect in a good Nazisploitation movie: concentration camp sex slaves, sadism, bondage, murder and cannibalism. 

Lisa and the Commandante get it on!

Seeking to exploit the art house success The Night Porter which had come out in 1975, this movie involves a special camp where attractive Jewish women have been sent to pleasure the German troops until they die.  As Commandante Conrad Von Starke tells the troops who have been assigned there on leave,  “You can use them in any way you want but they must suffer pain.”  So we got a bunch of gorgeous women, made up and prettied up as high class whores, but the soldiers of the Third Reich can only enjoy their favors if they are sadistic bastards who beat them up while screwing them.  Sounds like fun don’t it? Not. I think I’d have to say, “Mein Fuhrer can I please be sent to Paris to a regular whorehouse where I get to have fun and don’t have to rape the women?”   I would probably have been shot.


Ok, so we got a sex slave brothel where they’re gonna work the girls to death pleasuring the soldiers of the Third Reich.  When the beautiful prisoner Lisa Cohen (Daniela Poggi) can’t be broken by Commandante Von Starke or his dominatrix second in command, Von Starke gets the hots for her.  Originally desiring death because she thinks that she revealed her family’s hiding place to the Germans, Lisa shows no fear when Conrad (1) threatens to shoot her, (2) hangs her upside down and threatens to lower her into a pit of starving rats who will knaw her flesh off, (3) hangs her upside down and makes her watch another prisoner being lowered into a vat of acid.  Finally, after a sympathetic camp doctor convinces her that she’s not responsible for the death of her family and screws her, Lisa decides she wants to live. 


After deciding to live, when Von Starke threatens to shoot Lisa the next time, she kneels down and begins performing fellatio on the barrel of his pistol. (What self-respecting Nazi couldn’t love that ?!) After that the Commandante is in love with Lisa, moves her into his quarters and gives her special treatment.  Lisa turns a little Nazi herself and pushes a fellow prisoner out of her way to be shot.  When the Commandante’s dominatrix second in command is jealous and demands that he kills Lisa, Von Starke strangles her in a bathtub.  With the dead Nazi woman dead in the bathtub, Lisa comes in and tells Von Starke that she’s pregnant.


Why they wouldn’t just give her an abortion, I don’t know, but Lisa carries the baby to term and Lisa and Von Starke's son is born alive.  Right after the birth, Von Starke takes the baby away from Lisa and gives it to a soldier to be shot.   He explains that there will be one less Jew.


When the movie opens, it is after the war and we learn that Von Starke was tried for war crimes by the Allies and has served time in prison.   He was apparently spared execution based upon the testimony of Lisa.  Lisa has arranged to meet Conrad at the former site of the camp.   The movie is then told as a flashback.   Lisa gives Conrad one last sympathy fuck for old times sake and then shoots him for killing her baby.

Conrad and Lisa meet after the war

I actually enjoyed watching The Last Orgy of the Gestapo and, quite frankly, I enjoyed it a lot more than the much better made Salon Kitty which I also watched last week.   What kind of a sick bastard does that make me?  The notorious dinner scene which got the movie banned in the U.K. was, quite frankly, totally ridiculous.  The Nazis give a big dinner party (complete with Jewish whores scattered around the room to serve them).  The Nazi big shot scientist wants to establish Jew farms to harvest Jews for food like pigs (!).  He then announces that the meal coming up is meat from Jewish babies.  The Nazis then settle down for their meal of broiled Jew baby. (!)  When one of the prisoner whores passes out, they strip her down, pour Jew baby meat and liquor all over her and set fire to her.  Quite honestly, it was about the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen. 

The Nazi Dominatrix!

I guess I wasn’t shocked, because I had read so much about this movie on the internet that when I actually saw it, it was kind of a let down.  But part of what kept me watching is that Daniela Poggi is real, real good looking naked and you get to see a whole lot of her (even if she is hanging upside down!).   Unless you’re just into Nazisploitation and BDSM I don’t really recommend this movie.  But if you want to see a really good looking girl perform fellatio on a Ruger this is your movie.



Daniella Poggi is real easy on the eyes!

Saturday, September 20, 2014

DREAMS ARE WHAT LE CINEMA IS FOR...: SALON KITTY 1976

DREAMS ARE WHAT LE CINEMA IS FOR...: SALON KITTY 1976: The controversial Italia-Franco-German production, Salon Kitty, was released in the United States in 1977 under the title, Madam Kitty ...

Friday, September 2, 2011

Book Blogger Hop

Book Blogger Hop

This week's Book Blogger Hop from Crazy for Books.com asks the question "What are you most looking forward to this fall/autumn season?"

The Bad Catholic's Answer: Cooler weather! It has been scorching hot way down here in the Deep South all summer.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Hit Me, Beat Me, Make Me Write Bad Checks! Leopold von Sacher-Masoch's VENUS IN FURS


It is quite an accomplishment to have your name given to a sexual perversion. According to his biographer, James Cleugh, Leopold von Sacher-Masoch (1836-1895) “was born in 1836, in Lemberg, Galicia. His father was the Chief of Police, his mother a noble-woman. A nervous and excitable child, he was once badly thrashed by an aunt he adored, and though he later recalled the pain as terrible, he was enraptured by it. Thus the beginning. Later in life, he demanded sexual stimulus of an incredible nature: the whips had to have specially sharpened hooks or nails, and they were called for several times a day.” (From the dust jacket of The First Masochist: a biography of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, Stein and Day, 1967).


Sacher-Masoch was a prolific author, writing over ninety books. The novella, Venus In Furs (1870), is his most famous work. Venus In Furs was intended to be a part of a much larger work, a projected multi-volume work to be called The Legacy of Cain, in which Sacher-Masoch intended to diagnose all of the ills of the human condition. Venus In Furs was a part of the volume on Love which Sacher-Masoch completed and which contained a series of six novellas.


Venus In Furs is the story of the affair between Severin, a young nobleman, and Wanda, a wealthy widow. Venus In Furs begins with an elaborate framing story in which “Sacher-Masoch” has a dream in which he is talking with Venus, the Roman Goddess of Love, who is reclining by a fireplace wrapped only in furs. The Goddess and “Sacher-Masoch” talk about the true nature of the relationship between men and women. Venus tells “Sacher-Masoch” that man must either dominate woman or put himself entirely under her yoke:


Man is the one who desires, woman the one who is desired. This is woman’s entire but decisive advantage. Through his passion nature has given man into woman’s hands, and the woman who does not know how to make him her subject, her slave, her toy, and how to betray him with a smile in the end is not wise.

. . . The more devoted a woman shows herself, the sooner the man sobers down and becomes domineering. The more cruelly she treats him and the more faithless she is, the worse she uses him, the more wantonly she plays with him, the less pity she shows him, by so much the more will she increase his desire, be loved, worshipped by him.”


After “Sacher-Masoch” wakes up from his dream, he goes to have dinner with his friend Severin. “Sacher-Masoch” is appalled when Severin strikes his beautiful serving girl:

“But Severin,” I said placing my hand on his arm, “how can you treat a pretty young woman thus?

“Look at the woman,” he replied, blinking humorously with his eyes. “Had I flattered her, she would have cast the noose around my neck, but now, when I bring her up with kantchuk, she adores me.”

“. . . Goethe’s ‘you must be hammer or anvil’ is absolutely appropriate to the relationship between man and woman. Didn’t Lady Venus in your dream prove that to you? Woman’s power lies in man’s passion, and she knows how to use it, if man doesn’t understand himself. He has only one choice: to be the tyrant over or the slave of the woman. As soon as he gives in, his neck is under the yoke, and the lash will soon fall upon him.”



“Sacher-Masoch” sees a painting on Severin’s wall which shows a beautiful woman wrapped in furs, who appears to be the Venus of his dream, with Severin lying at her feet as her slave. When “Sacher-Masoch” asks about the painting, Severin gives him a manuscript titled “Confessions of a Supersensual Man.” The remainder of the novel consists of the contents of the manuscript.


Severin is living in an apartment building which has a garden with a statue of Venus in its center. Severin is sexually aroused by the statue and sits for hours and stares at it. He has a card with a drawing of Venus wearing furs which he keeps in a book. A beautiful young red headed widow lives on the first floor of the building. The widow, Wanda, borrows some books from Severin including the book in which he has left the card of Venus In Furs. One evening, as Severin is sitting in the garden fantasizing about the statue of Venus, he sees his Venus come to life wrapped in furs and reclining on a park bench. The Venus come to life turns out to be Wanda who has dressed herself as the Venus In Furs in Severin’s picture card.


Severin and Wanda become involved with each other. Wanda promises to live with Severin for a year in which he will have all the rights of a husband. After the year, Wanda will decide whether or not she wishes to marry Severin.


Severin tells Wanda that his fantasy is to be totally dominated by a woman. He tells her how his aunt, wearing a fur coat, once whipped him as a boy and how he became extremely sexually aroused. (Severin has a serious fur fetish!) Severin tells Wanda that he wants to be her slave and be totally in her power. At first Wanda is scandalized by the idea, but after Severin continues to pester her to allow him to be her slave, she gives in:

“I have two ideals of woman. If I cannot obtain the one that is noble and simple, the woman who will faithfully and truly share my life, well then I don’t want anything half-way or lukewarm. Then I would rather be subject to a woman without virtue, fidelity, or pity. Such a woman in her magnificent selfishness is likewise an ideal. If I am not permitted to enjoy the happiness of love, fully and wholly, I want to taste its pains and torments to the very dregs; I want to be maltreated and betrayed by the woman I love, and the more cruelly the better. This too is a luxury.”

“Have you lost your senses,” cried Wanda.

“I love you with all my soul,” I continued, “with all my senses, and your presence and personality are absolutely essential to me, if I am to go on living. Choose between my ideals. Do with me what you will, make of me your husband or your slave.”

“Very well,” said Wanda, contracting her small but strongly arched brows, “it seems to me it would be rather entertaining to have a man, who interests me and loves me, completely in my power; at least I shall not lack pastime. You were imprudent enough to leave the choice to me. Therefore I choose; I want you to be my slave, I shall make a plaything for myself out of you!”

. . . And everyone knows and feels how closely sexual love and cruelty are related.”



Wanda dresses Severin up as a servant and requires him to go by the name “Gregor.” When traveling Wanda requires "Gregor" to travel and eat with the other servants. Wanda and “Gregor” travel to Italy where Wanda leases a villa in the Italian countryside. “Gregor” is only allowed to come to Wanda when she calls for him. "Gregor" is required to address Wanda as his mistress at all times. When "Gregor" is called for, Wanda is usually dressed in her furs and little else. On most occasions, the Mistress will have “Gregor” tied up and whip him. Wanda may then allow “Gregor” to pleasure her.


The sexual intercourse is more implied than explicit. Venus In Furs suffers from the disease of 19th century novels that it is mostly talk. What little action there is in this book moves very, very slowly. Mostly the characters sit around in drawing rooms and talk. (Of course a lot of this talking occurs with “Gregor” kneeling at his Mistress’ feet while she reclines on the sofa wearing nothing but her furs and brandishing her whip!)

(Charcoal Drawing by Eileen Sedgwick)  

Mistress Wanda makes Severin sign a written agreement that he will continue to serve as her slave until she releases him. She also makes him sign a suicide note which gives Wanda the power to take his life if she so chooses. All of this apparently makes Severin very, very horny.


Wanda acquires a couple of beautiful black woman to assist her with the sex slave. The black women are at Wanda’s beck and call to tie Gregor up, tie Gregor to a plow in the garden, and generally beat Gregor’s ass. We are never told where these sexy black chicks came from. (Maybe Wanda put a classified ad in the paper that said “WANTED: AFRICAN DOMINATRIX TO HELP WITH SEX SLAVE!”) Wanda hires a German painter who is also very excited by Mistress Wanda and also wants to be whipped. The German painter is commissioned to paint the picture of Wanda and “Gregor” which “Sacher-Masoch” admired in Severin’s apartment.


Finally, Wanda begins to go out with other men. She makes “Gregor” find out about men she is attracted to and bring her messages back and forth to them. Ultimately, she tells Severin that she will marry him but it is really an elaborate cruelty. Wanda ties Severin up to a massive marble bed post and her new lover, a young Greek hunk, pulls aside the curtains and steps out of her bed. The Greek is cruel and masculine (in other words he is the kind who will slap Wanda on the ass and tell her to hurry up and bring him another beer!) Wanda then allows her new lover to whip “Gregor” unmercifully. Wanda tells Severin that she is tired of him and wants a man who will dominate her. She then releases Severin from his bond.


Briefly returning to the framing story, “Sacher-Masoch” asks Severin what the moral of the story is. Here is Severin’s answer:

“That woman, as nature has created her and as man is at present educating her, is his enemy. She can only be his slave or his despot, but never his companion. This she can become only when she has the same rights as he, and is his equal in education and work. At present we have only the choice of being hammer or anvil, and I was the kind of donkey who let a woman make a slave of him, do you understand? The moral of the tale is this: whoever allows himself to be whipped, deserves to be whipped.”


Venus In Furs is a classic of Sado-Masochistic literature by one of the guys who invented it. As a classic it definitely deserves at least four whips and chains out of five.